ICC mulling minnows’ fate
HONG KONG: Cricket’s governing body began its annual conference on Sunday with all eyes on controversial proposals to scrap its rotating presidency and bar non-Test playing nations from the next World Cup.
The International Cricket Council (ICC) kicked off four days of meetings between the chief executives’ committee and executive board, followed by a full council meeting on June 30, at a glitzy hotel in downtown Hong Kong.
The conference will consider moves, reportedly spearheaded by India and England, to scrap the two-year rotational presidency, although details of any new system remain unclear.
The proposal is expected to be met with vehement opposition from Pakistan and Bangladesh, who are scheduled to nominate the body’s next-but-one leader to take power from 2014.
PCB chairman Ijaz Butt told reporters before leaving for Hong Kong: “It’s Pakistan’s turn to nominate the president or the vice-president so we will not allow anyone to snatch that right.
“We have already shown our reservations on both the amendments and since the matter will be discussed at the meeting I am not going to make it more public.”
The ICC will also review its unpopular decision to limit the 2015 World Cup, in Australia and New Zealand, to the 10 full-member teams — excluding countries such as Ireland, the Netherlands, Canada and Kenya. ICC president Sharad Pawar has asked his board to discuss the matter at the conference, with the governing body looking to avoid a repeat of the seven-week World Cup, deemed by some critics as unnecessarily lengthy.
Officials are believed to be in favour of retaining a 10-team limit but may consider a qualifying tournament that would give minor nations a chance of reaching the event.
Also on the agenda will be the issue of whether the ICC should adopt the controversial Decision Review System (DRS).
The ICC has announced its desire for the DRS, whereby teams will be allowed one incorrect referral per innings to the television umpire, to be used for all Tests, ODIs and T20 Internationals. But powerful India, whose huge revenues give it a dominant position in the ICC, has never agreed to its use nor played a Test or one-day series when the DRS has been in operation.
The International Cricket Council (ICC) kicked off four days of meetings between the chief executives’ committee and executive board, followed by a full council meeting on June 30, at a glitzy hotel in downtown Hong Kong.
The conference will consider moves, reportedly spearheaded by India and England, to scrap the two-year rotational presidency, although details of any new system remain unclear.
The proposal is expected to be met with vehement opposition from Pakistan and Bangladesh, who are scheduled to nominate the body’s next-but-one leader to take power from 2014.
PCB chairman Ijaz Butt told reporters before leaving for Hong Kong: “It’s Pakistan’s turn to nominate the president or the vice-president so we will not allow anyone to snatch that right.
“We have already shown our reservations on both the amendments and since the matter will be discussed at the meeting I am not going to make it more public.”
The ICC will also review its unpopular decision to limit the 2015 World Cup, in Australia and New Zealand, to the 10 full-member teams — excluding countries such as Ireland, the Netherlands, Canada and Kenya. ICC president Sharad Pawar has asked his board to discuss the matter at the conference, with the governing body looking to avoid a repeat of the seven-week World Cup, deemed by some critics as unnecessarily lengthy.
Officials are believed to be in favour of retaining a 10-team limit but may consider a qualifying tournament that would give minor nations a chance of reaching the event.
Also on the agenda will be the issue of whether the ICC should adopt the controversial Decision Review System (DRS).
The ICC has announced its desire for the DRS, whereby teams will be allowed one incorrect referral per innings to the television umpire, to be used for all Tests, ODIs and T20 Internationals. But powerful India, whose huge revenues give it a dominant position in the ICC, has never agreed to its use nor played a Test or one-day series when the DRS has been in operation.
Published by Unknown
on 11:33.
Filed under
.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0
